It can't tell the difference between having the search terms in the same file and ten files having one term each. The current system is effectively capped at 20 bits and sucks at routing word queries. G2 already has a non-broken network model. Having a cross-platform hub only application would be a good start. Maybe not as much as BT has, but the contrast to G2 is pretty deep.Īnyway, for G2 the first step should be getting more applications using it. You talk about Gnutella and ED2K being old protocols and networks, but actually those networks have been making steady technical progress over the years. But that has been true for years and I haven't seen much happening. And you are right, ryo does have ideas about that, so do I, and many other people around. eMule, even modded, sucks.) So obviously I'd agree it would be a good thing if we could improve the G2. (So far I am still on track to go back to using Shareaza.
#CANT RIGHT CLICK ADD SHARE FOLDER SOULSEEKQT MOD#
I am currently testing an eMule mod and lacking those very few G2 sources really is noticeable. Although if you can find a G2 source it is usually a good one. And last I looked both Gnutella and ED2K were bigger, and hence more useful, than G2. The benefit of a P2P is not dependent on how old it is, it is dependent on how many peers it gives you access to. There is Kevo's proposal that hasn't even been discussed (ASE -> Active Source Exchange) mojo85 Posts: 115 Joined: 05:35 Time to clean house, I'm sure Ryo has some G2 spec revisions or improvements he would like to add. We need to refocus on this network freshen it up with new ideas as it is our bread and butter, all other networks are add-ons. We have not focused on G2, ever since its inception. If we want to take it safe, then time to create a suitable DHT for G2. Add mainline DHT to support BT and use mainlineDHT to offload SHA1 hashes found in G2.
they are old networks not worth supporting. Lets get real, in my opinion as it always has been we could do with less network. In all seriousness, folks when asking for more protocols please ask yourself if the 3 Networks (G1, G2, eD2k), and 3 protocols (HTTP, FTP, and BT) are not enough? Do they not get you what you want? What could possibly be an added benefit of Fast-Track aside the obvious of more virus and poor file integrity (weak hashes)? ROFL, Old_Death wow believed it until I noticed the small print.
0 kommentar(er)
